<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: phpBB is a Piece of Feces and May Be the Bane of My Existance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ryantoohil.com/2008/04/phpbb-is-a-piece-of-feces-and-may-be-the-bane-of-my-existance.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ryantoohil.com/2008/04/phpbb-is-a-piece-of-feces-and-may-be-the-bane-of-my-existance.php</link>
	<description>Stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Toohil</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryantoohil.com/2008/04/phpbb-is-a-piece-of-feces-and-may-be-the-bane-of-my-existance.php/comment-page-1#comment-15874</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Toohil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 14:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryantoohil.com/?p=267#comment-15874</guid>
		<description>&#039;tis a good point.

One of the big problems we run into with MySQL is that it&#039;s our one-size-fits-all solution for both our corporate databases and our customer mysql databases.

On our corporate databases, we can at least concentrate on optimizing performance, since it&#039;s a smaller subset of databases and tables.

For customer databases, we&#039;re at the mercy of our customers who have no idea what they&#039;re doing and setup million row tables with no indexes that do full table scans on each query. It&#039;d be one thing if free apps like phpBB and Wordpress mitigated the issue with smart queries, table design, and indexes, but they don&#039;t. They&#039;re so focused on the code (PHP) side of things that they completely overlook the performance aspect. I&#039;m guessing a big reason for this is that the development is always done on local/undertaxed systems.

That&#039;s why there&#039;s a cottage industry designed out of improving Wordpress performance as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8217;tis a good point.</p>
<p>One of the big problems we run into with MySQL is that it&#8217;s our one-size-fits-all solution for both our corporate databases and our customer mysql databases.</p>
<p>On our corporate databases, we can at least concentrate on optimizing performance, since it&#8217;s a smaller subset of databases and tables.</p>
<p>For customer databases, we&#8217;re at the mercy of our customers who have no idea what they&#8217;re doing and setup million row tables with no indexes that do full table scans on each query. It&#8217;d be one thing if free apps like phpBB and WordPress mitigated the issue with smart queries, table design, and indexes, but they don&#8217;t. They&#8217;re so focused on the code (PHP) side of things that they completely overlook the performance aspect. I&#8217;m guessing a big reason for this is that the development is always done on local/undertaxed systems.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why there&#8217;s a cottage industry designed out of improving WordPress performance as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tod</title>
		<link>http://blog.ryantoohil.com/2008/04/phpbb-is-a-piece-of-feces-and-may-be-the-bane-of-my-existance.php/comment-page-1#comment-15870</link>
		<dc:creator>Tod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ryantoohil.com/?p=267#comment-15870</guid>
		<description>It seems to me a lot of free software really doesn&#039;t scale well, databases especially.  When you figure it&#039;s dirt cheap to build a box that will move 50MB/sec from disk to memory or vice versa, and only a few thousand bucks to build one that will do hundreds of MB/sec, then you look at free SQL DB performance, it&#039;s like whaaaaa?

Maybe the industry will move towards more custom DB solutions since most of the time you only need a small number of queries and it&#039;s really not that hard to just &#039;write the code&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me a lot of free software really doesn&#8217;t scale well, databases especially.  When you figure it&#8217;s dirt cheap to build a box that will move 50MB/sec from disk to memory or vice versa, and only a few thousand bucks to build one that will do hundreds of MB/sec, then you look at free SQL DB performance, it&#8217;s like whaaaaa?</p>
<p>Maybe the industry will move towards more custom DB solutions since most of the time you only need a small number of queries and it&#8217;s really not that hard to just &#8216;write the code&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

